The United States International Trade Commission in May issued its final ruling in what has come to be known colloquially as “the Invisalign case.” It held that under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, the digital files could be considered an article. That sparked a discussion in the legal community, an appeal against the ruling, and amicus curiae filings — one from The Internet Association and one filed jointly by Public Knowledge and the Electronic Frontier Foundation — in support of that appeal.
Loading ...
The Madness of the ITC, Part 1: The Invisalign Case
Posted by: Richard Adhikari December 1, 2014 07:33 AMThe United States International Trade Commission in May issued its final ruling in what has come to be known colloquially as “the Invisalign case.” It held that under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, the digital files could be considered an article. That sparked a discussion in the legal community, an appeal against the ruling, and amicus curiae filings — one from The Internet Association and one filed jointly by Public Knowledge and the Electronic Frontier Foundation — in support of that appeal.