Get the ECT News Network Weekly Newsletter » View Sample | Subscribe
Welcome Guest | Sign In
ECTNews.com
E-Commerce Times TechNewsWorld CRM Buyer LinuxInsider
Discussions

E-Commerce Times Talkback

 
ECT News Community   »   E-Commerce Times Talkback   »   Re: ITC to Hear Prof's David v. Goliath Patent Case



Re: ITC to Hear Prof's David v. Goliath Patent Case
Posted by: Jim Offner 2008-03-21 22:38:02
See Full Story

Only weeks after having won a digital format battle against HD DVD, Sony finds itself entangled in a legal fight over the technology behind Blu-ray. The ITC will hear a case filed by a retired university professor with a 50-year engineering career against Sony, Motorola and more than 25 other companies for patent infringement. Gertrude Neumark Rothschild, a professor emeritus at Columbia University, is accusing more than 30 companies of violating patents she holds for LEDs and laser diodes that are used in Blu-ray players and other devices.


Has Ms. Rothschild ever manufactured anything?
Posted by: bugmenot1 2008-03-25 20:20:58 In reply to: Jim Offner
I wonder whether Ms. Rothschild has ever attempted to manufacture and sell these blue laser diodes. If not, I don't believe she should have the right to stand in the way of someone who is making them. If the law says differently, the law should be changed.
The point of patents, stated in the Constitution, is to advance the useful arts, or some such similar words. Someone who holds a patent without doing anything with it should not have any right to enforce the patent.
Actually, the whole idea of patents is somewhat suspect. See the explanations of various economic studies reported by Mike at Techdirt for very good reasons why patents actually slow progress, not advance it. But even if you aren't convinced by such arguments, it still makes little sense to let someone who holds a patent without commercializing it prevent others from commercializing it.
If I'm wrong and Ms. Rothschild has been manufacturing and selling laser diodes, then I would withdraw this comment, but I've not seen mention of any such activity on her part.

Comparatively speedy process?
Posted by: bugmenot1 2008-03-25 15:34:28 In reply to: Jim Offner
Comparatively speedy procees? Otherwise known as a fair trial and a quick hanging?
Jump to:
Given the spread of the Covid-19 Delta variant, if my employer requires me to return to the company's location in 2021, I will...
Agree because I'm fully vaccinated.
Agree if the company institutes a mandatory mask requirement and other safety protocols.
Comply reluctantly, because I can't afford to lose my job, but start looking for different employment.
Resign immediately so I can dedicate all of my time to find a job I feel is safer.
Resign because I'm not vaccinated and don't want to risk infection to myself or others.