Welcome | Sign In
ECTNews.com
E-Commerce Times LinuxInsider TechNewsWorld CRM Buyer MacNewsWorld
Discussion

TechNewsWorld Talkback

 
ECT News Community   »   TechNewsWorld Talkback   »   Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality



Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality
Posted by cypherpunks on 2003-09-12 00:12:17
In reply to MurrayB
'Thank you Mr. Enderle for providing an all too rare balanced view of this situation. Some IT people may work for outfits that may not be willing to fight this all the way to the Supreme Court. These people may have career difficulties if their CEO or CFO receives an IP violation letter from somebody's lawyer. Hard questions may follow this letter like, "What made you think that a $10,000 piece of software could be legally purchased for under a $100". "It took how many hours to install that server!", "Waddya mean ____ won't run on it."'
.
What IP violation letter? What IP?
.
If SCO were to send such a letter in Germany, they would be fined a quarter million euros for unfair competition since they failed to prove their case in court. If SCO has an actual case, why are they unable to prove their case in German court?
.
'There are plenty of good reasons for FUD right now and Mr. Enderle had done as all a favor by illustrating these facts.'
.
What facts are you talking about?
.
Until SCO made a link to this article from this main page, every single reply to Enderle criticized him for a flagrant amount of errors he made.




 * Topic  Author  Date
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  Rob Enderle  2003-09-02 14:44:35
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  joeblah  2003-11-19 07:42:06
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  jkondis  2003-11-10 22:57:56
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  jgoemat  2003-09-12 08:58:15
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  Caine  2003-09-17 11:12:39
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  MurrayB  2003-09-11 11:03:01
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  cypherpunks  2003-09-12 00:12:17
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  JohnOz  2003-09-11 06:27:01
This is amusing  cypherpunks  2003-09-10 07:59:28
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  vasarik  2003-09-10 05:21:45
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  cypherpunks  2003-09-09 03:15:12
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  captwatto  2003-09-08 00:40:33
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  imorse  2003-09-07 13:24:40
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  tom1000000  2003-09-05 04:51:28
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  larsB  2003-09-04 11:52:26
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  nene  2003-09-03 23:56:02
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  kjelland  2003-09-03 22:38:38
Patents, evidence and conlusion?  LinuxCrunchie  2003-09-03 20:53:19
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  tungtung  2003-09-03 20:35:41
What theft?  flatlander03  2003-09-03 18:31:10
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  dsettanni  2003-09-03 18:00:06
There WAS no DDOS of attack  cypherpunks  2003-09-04 15:37:44
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  exposeu  2003-09-03 17:59:39
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  nobby69  2003-09-03 17:15:04
story founders on the word "seems"  hipparchus  2003-09-03 17:11:35
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  dclayton2  2003-09-03 17:01:48
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  sinp  2003-09-03 16:23:42
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  sinp  2003-09-04 10:06:50
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  jstorch  2003-09-03 11:00:23
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  JIMMYDORSEY  2003-09-03 09:44:53
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  RobEnderle  2003-09-03 12:37:33
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  JohnOz  2003-09-11 07:14:32
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  cypherpunks  2003-09-04 14:04:43
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  stend  2003-09-04 06:36:45
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  nabet  2003-09-03 16:16:20
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  matE1  2003-09-03 08:58:54
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  joeklein  2003-09-03 08:47:23
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  RobEnderle  2003-09-03 12:19:07
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  vidar_waits  2003-09-04 08:52:17
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  JohnSeehagen  2003-09-03 22:29:51
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  lundbergaj  2003-09-03 08:37:55
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  RobEnderle  2003-09-03 12:11:47
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  stend  2003-09-04 14:29:29
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  cypherpunks  2003-09-04 14:19:25
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  vidar_waits  2003-09-03 06:25:15
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  RobEnderle  2003-09-03 12:04:50
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  cypherpunks  2003-09-04 14:23:34
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  stend  2003-09-04 06:51:01
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  vidar_waits  2003-09-04 06:09:35
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  mec_2  2003-09-04 00:41:19
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  whoever  2003-09-03 14:35:07
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  linuxra  2003-09-03 05:00:09
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  observer387  2003-09-03 04:28:06
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  redbluff67  2003-09-03 00:07:05
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  fmalita  2003-09-04 07:15:48
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  Kelledin  2003-09-02 20:52:43
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  RobEnderle  2003-09-03 13:00:17
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  JohnOz  2003-09-11 07:36:20
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  Kelledin  2003-09-03 20:46:02
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  flatlander03  2003-09-03 18:49:15
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  exposeu  2003-09-03 18:15:05
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  jonabbey  2003-09-03 16:00:35
I read the contracts too. Where did it say that?!?!?  allankim  2003-09-02 20:12:11
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  nathanh  2003-09-02 20:03:28
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  glennthigpen  2003-09-02 19:49:22
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  RobEnderle  2003-09-03 13:13:48
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  cypherpunks  2003-09-04 14:30:57
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  glennthigpen  2003-09-04 20:45:04
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  cypherpunks  2003-09-05 12:54:38
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  stend  2003-09-04 07:07:21
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  exposeu  2003-09-05 03:57:46
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  OzRoy  2003-09-03 23:11:10
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  whoever  2003-09-03 14:48:37
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  cypherpunks  2003-09-04 14:36:47
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  cypherpunks  2003-09-02 19:12:11
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  SteadyClimber  2003-09-02 19:01:14
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  RobEnderle  2003-09-03 12:48:49
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  stend  2003-09-04 14:56:19
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  cypherpunks  2003-09-04 15:20:43
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  tsudhonimh  2003-09-02 18:17:50
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  jfkfj4  2003-09-02 18:00:59
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  heimdal  2003-09-02 17:46:55
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  treadlightlee  2003-09-02 16:44:04
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  RobEnderle  2003-09-03 12:52:11
I've read the contracts too  heimdal  2003-09-02 16:43:55
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  rishikesh1  2003-09-02 16:17:04
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  RobEnderle  2003-09-03 11:57:59
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  stend  2003-09-04 15:21:09
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  cypherpunks  2003-09-04 13:57:21
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  exposeu  2003-09-03 18:23:50
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  joeklein  2003-09-03 12:56:10
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  harkonlukas  2003-09-02 16:06:31
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  RobEnderle  2003-09-03 11:50:21
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  JohnOz  2003-09-11 06:57:49
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  stend  2003-09-04 08:04:20
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  cypherpunks  2003-09-04 03:24:03
Re: SCO vs. IBM: The Other Reality  voss749  2003-09-03 14:58:42
Jump to:
Your Name: [modify]
* Subject:
Choose Icon:

Submissions containing gratuitous promotions or advertisements
will not be posted. [Message Board and Community Rules]


* Comments:

Notify me by e-mail when someone responds to my post.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google+ RSS
ManageEngine