> Your last comment is the most interesting, because > regardless of the outcome this case will likely > change how licenses are done and in breaking this > license IBM may be opening up its own intellectual > property in an uncontrolled way. . What license has been broken Rob? Can you quote exactly what license and what part of the license was broken and how? . > But, in general, you’ve got my point. The court > system is an artificial world and this works for > SCO. They are the small guy against the big > company, they look like the victim, down to the > point where they are actually being beat up > illegally (DNS attacks), I’m quite sure that > should the judge even rule slightly in SCO’s > favor on a minor point he’ll get blasted by the > OSS crowd (Judges really don’t like this) and > there is even a chance that the OSS crowd will > contact some of the jury resulting in a mistrial > and possible early ruling for SCO. I wouldn’t > want to be either side in this, but I really > wouldn’t want to be IBM legal. . Let me get this straight: . You're saying our judicial system is so prejudiced that they will side with the "little guy" no matter how bad his behavior has been? This might happen in a small hick town - it doesn't happen in federal court. IBM will take this to the supreme court if it needs to.