>at least some legal departments appear to find their arguments compelling. Those legal departments must not have done much research into this case then. Many others have and determined that there is no case. What we really have here is an example of a corporate amnesia. The top executives at SCO are all pretty new at the company and have no real idea what Caldera did as far as merging technology from Linux and SysV - they even published white papers on the topic. Not to mention the volumes of original Unix code that they've open sourced, was widely available w/o NDA in acadamia, or the outcome of the legal battle between AT&T and BSD, which they intend on repeating. They have forgotten (or ignored) all of that and see every similarity as an example of where they were wronged. Maybe Alzheimer's is a better analogy. They are dying and lashing out because they don't know where they are and where they came from. Why take the risk with any technology? Who is to say that the latest proprietary software doesn't have holes that will cause your company to lose buckets of money due to downtime and/or corrupted data? Or that the company will be sued because they've stolen code?