Interesting post and it looks like you did a lot of work. Wish others had done the same. I don’t think we disagree on Copyright it does protect the expression of ideas. The real question is “was Linux from scratch or did it borrow from UNIX” as SCO claims and evidently IBM admits (it was this admission that started this whole mess in the first place, well coupled with a falling out between IBM and SCO). All I’ve ever said was that SCO has a case and that people at risk should turn this over to their legal departments for proper risk mitigation and then move on. Folks who are extremely risk adverse may want to shift to BSD or stay with their proprietary platform until this is settled, and employees should be reminded that being an OSS advocate does not release you form company policy. (I’ll bet some of the comments people are sending around would get them fired given the zero tolerance policies that exist in some firms, and I’ll bet there is an IT manager sweating bullets wondering if one of his (or her) folks is actually doing the denial of service attack). Your view is the risk is slight, mine is it isn’t, in the end we agree there is risk. The people to take it are attorneys, let them do their job and listen to their advice. Why make this a personal risk or one that puts your department or company at risk if you don’t have to? This isn’t a great time to be unemployed and that first article you mention was written largely because of my concern that too many IT folks were putting their jobs and the jobs of their people at risk needlessly because they weren’t doing a proper job of justifying their decisions. Thanks for posting!