See Full Story
Last week was defined largely by two interesting stories. One had Apple bringing some manufacturing back to the U.S., and the other revolved around the outcome of the latest trial between Apple and Samsung. It shows you how hard it is to read a judge, though. I thought Judge Lucy Koh would likely raise the award from $1.05
Samsung and Apple appear to be in a dance to the death. Though I'm a big fan of competition, I don't see this battle doing anything but hurting both firms and the buyers of their technology.
The article states: "Samsung is executing on a strategy very similar to the one Apple used to displace Sony at the top of the TV stack..."
Shouldn't it be "Samsung" instead of "Apple" in the above sentence?
There are more than a few word slippages in this article. I generally let these slide, but I just want to verify that the above example is in fact slippage, and not intended.