Headline FeedsTechNewsWorld Talkback
|
|
Re: Verizon and Google Enter Holiday Party Late and Sulky
Posted by: Paul Hartsock 2011-12-17 11:55:21
See Full Story
The Galaxy Nexus has finally arrived in the United States after showing up in places like Europe and Hong Kong several weeks ago. This is a Samsung smartphone running the very latest and greatest version of Android, Ice Cream Sandwich. And there are no factory-installed tweaks to the OS either -- it's straight Android, no mixer. Obviously this is good news for those who've been excited to see the latest Google superphone firsthand, but the timing for this launch is very unusual. It arrived on shelves Thursday -- right at the top of holiday shopping crazy season.
Eliminating the use of 'personal electronics' while driving
Posted by: akcoyote 2011-12-17 12:32:50 In reply to: Paul Hartsock
Personally, I think this is an Excellent idea. I am willing to give up the 'convenience' of conducting business or chatting about where to go for dinner with friends and family while cruising through traffic.
I already try to minimize my use of my phone in the car because it DOES distract! I see drivers making boneheaded moves while chatting away (on phone or hands free) and they often seem oblivious to the accident they almost caused. (Naturally I never do this.... unless someone observes it.)
As for enforcing such rules. There are only two options that I see having any possibility of success:
1) Make it technically impossible to use a cell phone while the car is moving. The GPS in the phone could be used for this and the circuitry would cost virtually nothing.
2) Make any driver involved in an accident guilty by default if they were on the phone. You get a ticket and your insurance company only pays off the other guy and then only if they weren't on the phone in which case both drivers are 'uninsured' and the insurance company is completely off the hook. Same thing if they have a 'single car' accident where the property damage would be uninsured for both your car and any other person's property.
In the first case, technology trumps stupid and in the second 'money rules'.
The first would require an FCC ruling that no phones could be used in the US without the disabling feature.
The second would cost the guilty drivers a small fortune relative to status quo.
As for not talking to passengers, it is unenforceable in any form despite the studies showing it truly does reduce driver awareness. See the stats where teenage drivers are not allowed to transport friends (other teens) until they have some experience. The accident rates during the restricted period are reduced dramatically and remain below the average for all drivers (in the age groups) even after carrying passengers is allowed.
Currently 30 states (and 19 countries including Canada) have some restrictions on carrying passengers until reaching a specific level of experience or age. These are far from uniform, but offer some statistical evidence.
I already try to minimize my use of my phone in the car because it DOES distract! I see drivers making boneheaded moves while chatting away (on phone or hands free) and they often seem oblivious to the accident they almost caused. (Naturally I never do this.... unless someone observes it.)
As for enforcing such rules. There are only two options that I see having any possibility of success:
1) Make it technically impossible to use a cell phone while the car is moving. The GPS in the phone could be used for this and the circuitry would cost virtually nothing.
2) Make any driver involved in an accident guilty by default if they were on the phone. You get a ticket and your insurance company only pays off the other guy and then only if they weren't on the phone in which case both drivers are 'uninsured' and the insurance company is completely off the hook. Same thing if they have a 'single car' accident where the property damage would be uninsured for both your car and any other person's property.
In the first case, technology trumps stupid and in the second 'money rules'.
The first would require an FCC ruling that no phones could be used in the US without the disabling feature.
The second would cost the guilty drivers a small fortune relative to status quo.
As for not talking to passengers, it is unenforceable in any form despite the studies showing it truly does reduce driver awareness. See the stats where teenage drivers are not allowed to transport friends (other teens) until they have some experience. The accident rates during the restricted period are reduced dramatically and remain below the average for all drivers (in the age groups) even after carrying passengers is allowed.
Currently 30 states (and 19 countries including Canada) have some restrictions on carrying passengers until reaching a specific level of experience or age. These are far from uniform, but offer some statistical evidence.
