'The real question is “was Linux from scratch or did it borrow from UNIX” as SCO claims and evidently IBM admits' Linux has been in development for over 10 years. It's development has been very public, and very well documented. So the answer to your 'real question' is 'Yes, linux was developed from scratch'. I thought that was pretty obvious. It used ideas and based it's structure on Unix, but if it ever stole anything then it would of been revealed a long time before now. I would like you to answer the following very simple questions. 1) Why doesn't SCO reveal which code they believe to be stolen to the linux developers, or at least a few of them under a signed NDA? 2)Why don't they want the linux developers to remove the code? 3)Even if some of the code was stolen from them, why does SCO believe they have the right to charge $699 for the rest of the code they did not write? About question 3. They are not billing people for just the SCO code. They are billing people for linux itself. If they were billing for just the SCO code then I would have the right to make them tell me which parts I am purchasing so that I then have the option of obtaining a competetors version of that product. But as we all know, SCO are not revealing which parts of the linux kernel are theirs.