Welcome | Sign In
ECTNews.com
E-Commerce Times LinuxInsider TechNewsWorld CRM Buyer MacNewsWorld
Discussion

Discussions Boards:
LinuxInsider Talkback


Ubuntu Strikes Out on Its Own Again


"I don't know what's wrong with Canonical," said blogger Robert Pogson. "They seem not to understand that GNU/Linux is a cooperative product of the world, and wasting resources to do things differently when existing software is working well is poisoning the well. FLOSS is the right way to do IT, whether as a developer, a distributor, OEM, retailer or user."
Join the Discussion >

Linux: The Gold Standard of Code


"Is Linux code the 'benchmark of quality'? Well, it is very good, no doubt about that," said Google+ blogger Brett Legree. "The main take-away point from the study should be that open source software, including Linux, is on par with proprietary software from a quality perspective. So, Linux code could be considered a benchmark of quality -- it is as good as anything else out there."
Join the Discussion >


 
ECT News Community   »   LinuxInsider Talkback



 * Topic  Author  Date
Re: Where the Buck Stops  Stuart McKee  2005-05-16 11:04:10
Re: Where the Buck Stops  asorrymsadmin  2005-05-16 11:52:12
Re: There's No Need To Fear Open Source  Kathy Dempsey  2005-05-16 08:33:10
Re: There's No Need To Fear Open Source  bugmenotcom  2005-05-16 08:46:14
Re: Open Source: Chicken Little and Age-Appropriate Explanations  Heather J. Meeker  2005-05-04 05:23:32
Re: Open Source: Chicken Little and Age-Appropriate Explanations  mauricemcc  2005-05-12 12:29:20
Re: Open Source: Chicken Little and Age-Appropriate Explanations  nobot  2005-05-12 05:13:52
Re: Open Source: Chicken Little and Age-Appropriate Explanations  mitch074  2005-05-05 13:29:51
Re: Open Source: Chicken Little and Age-Appropriate Explanations  sopfobrhbgwhp  2005-05-05 12:22:53
Re: Open Source: Chicken Little and Age-Appropriate Explanations  darose  2005-05-05 08:47:19
Re: Open Source: Chicken Little and Age-Appropriate Explanations  anomalous  2005-05-05 01:58:27
Re: Open Source: Chicken Little and Age-Appropriate Explanations  kawabago  2005-05-04 19:05:31
examples of free software being hampered by software patents  minmax  2005-05-04 16:04:52
Re: Firefox Converting Consumers but Are Enterprises Next?  Jennifer LeClaire  2005-04-15 16:19:30
Re: Firefox Converting Consumers but Are Enterprises Next?  CarRoy  2005-05-09 07:00:15
Re: Bill Would Force Car Makers To Share Computer Code  John P. Mello Jr.  2005-05-05 19:41:38
Re: Bill Would Force Car Makers To Share Computer Code  Kagehi  2005-05-07 17:08:15
Re: Bill Would Force Car Makers To Share Computer Code  Maniac42  2005-05-06 12:34:35
Re: Linux Use Drives Innovation  Tom Adelstein  2005-05-06 08:24:02
Re: Linux Use Drives Innovation  Maniac42  2005-05-06 12:17:10
Re: Media Companies Seek Documents in SCO Suit  Anonymous  2005-04-29 17:35:47
Re: Media Companies Seek Documents in SCO Suit  bugmenot  2005-04-29 17:37:31
Re: Linux Still Struggling for Desktop Acceptance  Carol Sliwa  2005-03-12 07:23:26
Re: Linux Still Struggling for Desktop Acceptance  Barronomre  2005-04-23 11:49:21
Re: Linux Still Struggling for Desktop Acceptance  chris-uk  2005-03-12 22:53:19
The problem is Dell and HP etc.  cyber_rigger  2005-03-12 10:01:58
Re: The problem is Dell and HP etc.  Kagehi  2005-03-14 11:29:33
Re: The Pros and Cons of Moving to Linux  Matt Leppard  2005-04-17 05:40:33
Re: The Pros and Cons of Moving to Linux  ktraglin  2005-04-18 14:22:46
Re: The Pros and Cons of Moving to Linux  maddude  2005-04-19 21:58:57
Re: The Pros and Cons of Moving to Linux  fishyfool  2005-04-18 11:15:04
Re: The Pros and Cons of Moving to Linux  mrdocs  2005-04-17 06:24:02
Re: The Pros and Cons of Moving to Linux  Barronomre  2005-04-23 11:14:51
Re: The Pros and Cons of Moving to Linux  digitalmouse  2005-04-19 01:19:48
Re: The Pros and Cons of Moving to Linux  Barronomre  2005-04-23 11:12:15
Re: New Opera Browser Fails at Basics  Anick Jesdanun  2005-04-22 09:22:54
Re: New Opera Browser Fails at Basics  Nanobot  2005-04-22 11:48:14
Re: Socialtext: Wiki Meets Blogging  Mike Heck  2005-04-17 23:11:09
Re: Socialtext: Wiki Meets Blogging  kaaloo  2005-04-17 23:19:14
Re: Yoga Is Focus in Groundbreaking Copyright Case  Anonymous  2005-04-09 05:58:04
Re: Yoga Is Focus in Groundbreaking Copyright Case  devnull  2005-04-12 12:37:31
Re: Taking the Plunge into Linux  Matt Leppard  2005-04-10 06:14:38
Re: Taking the Plunge into Have IT your way ... GNU-Linux  OldHawk777  2005-04-11 05:44:43
Re: Sun Slams Predatory GPL  Tom Sanders  2005-04-06 10:51:47
Re: Sun Slams Predatory GPL  bayo  2005-04-08 04:59:27
Re: Sun Slams Predatory GPL  raton  2005-04-07 14:41:27
Wrong. GPL helps developing nations. Schwartz doesn't care.  ccady  2005-04-06 10:56:29
Re: Sun Poised for Growth in Asia-Pacific Region  Sharifah Kasim  2005-04-08 04:33:48
Re: Sun Poised for Growth in Asia-Pacific Region  Admin01  2005-04-08 04:50:14
Re: A Long-Term View: Software Should Be Patentable in Europe  Michael Q. Lee  2005-04-06 05:22:08
Lee is right about one thing.  Frihet  2005-04-07 10:10:10
Re: A Long-Term View: Software Should Be Patentable in Europe  steelpillow  2005-04-07 08:36:58
Re: A Long-Term View: Software Should Be Patentable in Europe  raarts  2005-04-07 04:04:37
Re: A Long-Term View: Software Should Be Patentable in Europe  linuxguy56789  2005-04-07 03:05:37
20 years?  QuantumG  2005-04-06 22:34:34
Re: A Long-Term View: Software Should Be Patentable in Europe  RevSnow  2005-04-06 21:55:05
Re: A Long-Term View: Software Should Be Patentable in Europe  J_W_W  2005-04-06 15:02:24
Re: A Long-Term View: Software Should Be Patentable in Europe  tobbeh  2005-04-06 12:53:50
Re: A Long-Term View: Software Should Be Patentable in Europe  ccady  2005-04-06 10:51:15
Re: Firefox Vulnerability Puts Sensitive Information at Risk  Jennifer LeClaire  2005-04-05 09:21:33
Re: Firefox Vulnerability Puts Sensitive Information at Risk  bugmenot  2005-04-06 18:11:17
Re: Firefox Vulnerability Puts Sensitive Information at Risk  Justinus  2005-04-05 18:26:04
Inaccuracies in the article  kazriko  2005-04-05 09:57:40
Re: Writing Linux History: Groklaw's Role in the SCO Controversy  David Halperin  2004-03-01 07:36:28
How does Snake Bowel know where Pamela Jones lives?  bugmenot  2005-04-01 08:18:14
Re: Writing Linux History: Groklaw's Role in the SCO Controversy  mikelist  2004-03-06 10:20:41
I somehow think that David Halperin isn't just ...  AndreasK  2004-03-06 06:38:57
PJ? Please....  rfeynman  2004-03-02 11:48:16
Sour Grapes  DarrenR114  2004-03-06 06:39:26
Re: Writing Linux History: Groklaw's Role in the SCO Controversy  red_guy  2004-03-02 05:22:49
Re: Writing Linux History: Groklaw's Role in the SCO Controversy  alanvgreen  2004-03-02 02:05:19
Re: Writing Linux History: Groklaw's Role in the SCO Controversy  sjworth  2004-03-01 18:07:06
Re: Writing Linux History: Groklaw's Role in the SCO Controversy  tungtung  2004-03-01 16:28:20
Re: Writing Linux History: Groklaw's Role in the SCO Controversy  Joe_Bunting  2004-03-01 15:58:35
Surprising bias and personal attacks; incompetence or malice?  techwatcher  2004-03-01 15:20:16
Re: Writing Linux History: Groklaw's Role in the SCO Controversy  Sleepy  2004-03-01 15:17:51
Re: Writing Linux History: Groklaw's Role in the SCO Controversy  harlan_  2004-03-01 13:37:20
Re: Writing Linux History: Groklaw's Role in the SCO Controversy  scoareliars  2004-03-01 13:25:15
If we're going for irony, let's observe that Stowell's initials are BS  WallyBass  2004-03-01 12:08:34
Re: Writing Linux History: Groklaw's Role in the SCO Controversy  ecoli  2004-03-01 12:06:55
Re: Writing Linux History: Groklaw's Role in the SCO Controversy  tonyoddjob  2004-03-01 11:52:03
Re: Writing Linux History: Groklaw's Role in the SCO Controversy  paleduck  2004-03-01 11:45:53
Re: Writing Linux History: Groklaw's Role in the SCO Controversy  rkhalloran  2004-03-01 10:53:21
Big Blue Looms Large?  stanmuffin  2004-03-01 07:42:40
Re: Big Blue Looms Large?  RickyF  2004-03-01 12:58:25
Re: Big Blue Looms Large?  RickyF  2004-03-01 12:50:31
Re: No Really, Lower the Volume Already  Philip H. Albert  2005-03-29 05:40:20
Re: No Really, Lower the Volume Already  redcurrant  2005-03-30 23:55:35
Re: No Really, Lower the Volume Already  redcurrant  2005-03-30 12:12:18
Re: No Really, Lower the Volume Already  J_W_W  2005-03-30 14:07:24
Re: No Really, Lower the Volume Already  abominog  2005-03-29 20:49:34
Re: No Really, Lower the Volume Already  J_W_W  2005-03-29 15:43:27
Re: No Really, Lower the Volume Already  Kagehi  2005-03-29 11:27:19
Re: Puppy Definitely Not a Dog of a Program  Michael Herman  2005-03-29 03:08:47
Re: Puppy Definitely Not a Dog of a Program  bugmenot  2005-03-29 03:15:07

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56

Your Name: [modify]
* Subject:
Choose Icon:

Submissions containing gratuitous promotions or advertisements
will not be posted. [Message Board and Community Rules]


* Comments:

Notify me by e-mail when someone responds to my post.

Jump to:
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google+ RSS