E-Commerce Times Talkback
|
|
|
The annual uproar among online consumers who try to
return merchandise bought via the Internet generally
occurs around the Christmas holidays, but
some e-tailers make it tough on buyers all year long.
Wading through the often hard-to-find
return policies can be a nightmare. The polices are usually strict,
certainly not consumer-oriented and often deal breakers.
Posted by: Liz Mazzella 2001-05-10 19:47:12 In reply to: ECT News
Posted by: Bonnie 2001-06-07 13:47:21 In reply to: Liz Mazzella
Of course if the item is defective, that is a different story. In that case, the customer deserves to get a new product, or a refund.
Posted by: kathleen 2001-04-27 14:15:44 In reply to: ECT News
i have been fortunate that the companies i have dealt with - talbots, cloudwalkers, shoedini, and nordstroms have great policies about returning items. it is not a hassle. however, it would help immensely if websites were more user friendly and upfront about their return policies.
Posted by: Chuck Farr 2001-04-26 00:51:46 In reply to: ECT News
On "bricks" - some bricks and mortar stores won't allow returns of goods purchased online to their stores; e.g. Victoria's Secret.
Posted by: Shava Nerad 2001-04-24 15:42:36 In reply to: ECT News
Posted by: Steve 2001-04-23 22:20:49 In reply to: ECT News
Posted by: Jeffsters 2001-04-24 11:37:51 In reply to: Steve
It is the amount that the dealer will have to mark the product down to unload it later as an open box customer return. Add the cost of having someone open and verify all the parts are there and repack it "correctly" after 9-10 times the customer just stuffed it all back in and there you have your $40!
The comparison to the gap was also wrong. The Gap has GREAT margin and more often than not, unless you wore and washed the clothes, can resell at full price.
You told a story of shopping for best price so the dealer's margin was already low. Consumers always cry that "relationship" stuff in cases like this. If you were all so concerned with relationships you would pay a little more at a local electronics store that had on site support and repair, and where you could touch the product. But that's not really what you care about...you care about price! In the end you would always go back to Simon or what ever and go with that low price. So stop crying and go local or go price...you're not going to get both! If you do...that company will be another dot-com casualty in less than a year.
Posted by: Rabbit26 2001-04-24 14:19:01 In reply to: Jeffsters
Based on your comments, I guess it's completely wrong for someone to be upset with bad customer service. Good to know.
Greenberg wasn't asking for the moon. He was simply requesting a clear, simple return policy that took into account the realities of shopping, in particular shopping for gifts. He even made suggestions for e-tailers to execute the policy.
I think that maybe you guys should be a little less defensive -- spend a little less time assuming that customers are enemies, trying to undermine businesses by mispackaging returns. Instead, perhaps consider that Greenberg is not the only person who feels that e-tailers could make the return process easier and more sensible.
And I think one can safely assume his comments about the restocking fee were a little tongue in cheek.
Posted by: Jacques 2001-04-24 16:06:47 In reply to: Rabbit26
Posted by: El Jefe 2001-04-25 11:53:24 In reply to: Jacques
The point is that returns policies must vary by product...and do at most e-tailers. There are MANY bricks and clicks retailers with different online returns policies. Is that right? Perhaps not in some cases, but returns, pricing, etc. is largely a function of the channel you bought your product through.
Posted by: FrustrMerchant 2001-05-25 20:47:34 In reply to: El Jefe
What has astonished me is the ridiculous and inconsiderate nature of some people who shop, both online and at retail stores. With these few, they have no concern whatsoever for what their lack of planning or thought when they decided to make a purchase. They just buy and return for little or no reason. They don't give a d**n about what it does to the merchant.
I think the whole system's wrong. Neither brick nor click retailers should take back good merchandise. Customers who buy through mail-order or online should check the merchandise immediately for damage and be required to reject it or accept it at the time of delivery (yes, UPS & Fedex would have to wait). If it isn't broken or the wrong item, then it's a "done deal". What a bunch of cr*p it is to send something back just because the person you bought if for doesn't like it. Why should the merchant bear the economic loss for the customer's bad choice?
Sometimes I've heard "it wasn't what I expected". Again, what a bunch of cr*p. There's a good picture, description, dimensions, weight and material listed. If that isn't enough information, then they shouldn't buy it!
It costs merchants about as much to reprocess and dispose of returns as shoplifting costs them. I believe the similarities don't stop there. The customer who returns something because they made a bad choice is being very inconsiderate and, in my opinion, is causing harm to the merchant for no good reason which is itself immoral. So . . . buy what you want and live with your choices!
Posted by: pywacket 2002-05-22 14:46:04 In reply to: FrustrMerchant
Posted by: Martin 2001-06-01 18:52:05 In reply to: FrustrMerchant
Unfortunately, consumers aren't psychic. When I wander down a store aisle, I can't mind-meld with the merchandise to see if its biorhythms match my own, or telepathically contact my sister to see if she will adore the gift I want to buy her. So I do the best I can -- and if it doesn't work out, I try again.
Not every aspect of a job is pleasant -- accepting returns is a courtesy provided by retailers so consumers will have more confidence when they make a purchase. Learn to live with it if you're in the game for the long haul.
Posted by: Clem 2001-05-29 16:27:24 In reply to: FrustrMerchant
Customers are not there to do you favors. Customers are not there to cuddle you. Customers give you money. You give them a product. You are free to charge what you like for that product. For all I care, you can charge more money because you think customers are an evil breed that has it in for you.
But if it is costing you as much to reprocess returns as it does to lose products to shoplifters, holy cow, don't you think you are doing something wrong?
If you're in business to make money and don't care about serving customers, go right ahead. But it's a simple fact that in order to make money in business, one must understand that customers are human beings, who change their mind, sometimes for very good reason, sometimes not. Learn to like it, or get out while the gettin's good.
The idea that it is immoral for shoppers to return a product that they are not satisfied with is about as bizarre as they come. Why should customers be sympathetic to your needs when you are so unsympathetic to theirs?
Posted by: Anon. Coward 2001-04-28 12:28:12 In reply to: El Jefe







Headline Feeds