Welcome Guest | Sign In
ECTNews.com
E-Commerce Times TechNewsWorld CRM Buyer LinuxInsider
Discussions

E-Commerce Times Talkback

 
ECT News Community   »   E-Commerce Times Talkback   »   Re: Panel Says Junkfood Ads Lead to Obesity in Children



Re: Panel Says Junkfood Ads Lead to Obesity in Children
Posted by: Libby Quaid 2005-12-07 10:47:10
See Full Story

SpongeBob SquarePants and characters like him should promote only healthy food for kids, a panel of scientists said yesterday. Food marketing strongly influences what children eat, the Institute of Medicine said in a comprehensive review of scientific evidence on the issue. Overwhelmingly, food and drinks marketed to kids are high in calories and low in nutrition, the report said. "It's putting our children at risk," said panel member Ellen A. Wartella, psychology professor at the University of California, Riverside.


Re: Panel Says Junkfood Ads Lead to Obesity in Children
Posted by: brentoboy 2005-12-07 10:53:36 In reply to: Libby Quaid
Get a life.
Without parents buying the trashy food, the kids wouldnt get fat. Get a spine, and be more aware of what your kids are watching and eating. Its the parent's responsibility to write to the producers of spunge bob and complain that they are advertising crap and they dont like it.
Kids dont buy thier own groceries. Lets get real here, are we all irresponsible mindless robots who arent allowed to be accoutnable for our choices? Are parents not responsible for the wellbeing of their kids, is your TV raising your kids?
Parents need to get a life, professors who think there is a problem need to fight it with something besides legislation, and people need to be aware of what they eat.
Legislative restrictions on "healthy advertising" is stupid, becuase month to month whats healthy and what's not changes. Is milk good? eggs? yogort? Nuts? where do you draw the line? Its called personal choice - and parental involvment.
Jump to:
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google+ RSS
Is native advertising good for journalism?
Yes -- It's a reasonable source of additional revenue for media outlets to support their traditional editorial efforts.
Yes -- Paid-for articles can contain useful information, but readers might bypass them if they look too much like ads.
Maybe -- But only if it's clearly labeled as paid-for content.
No -- I don't trust any information from media outlets that cloak paid-for content as objective journalism.
No -- Native advertising is confusing and devious, and it threatens the fabric of traditional journalism.
I Don't Know -- I don't understand what native advertising is.